data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/aa68c/aa68c14ee7baebac1ce3901dcab45db3edd161e9" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/99e40/99e4063ccf8af077a051bf5281396fd9298c6579" alt=""
“Hot Cross Buns” photo taken by FraserElliot*In the June 2017 issue of Clinical Social Work Journal, Brian Rasmussen, reviews the dominance and weakness of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT).The review points out a number of pros and cons of CBT, and an especially compelling argument is made for clinicians to reflect on how they might learn, practice, and aim for, a contextually conscientious application of clinical social work interventions:Western cultural norms of hyper-individualism lay the ground-work for theories and treatments that locate mental health problems in the conscious, rational mind of the person, often decontextualize from his or her social surround.*”Hot cross buns” in CBT refers to the cross-sectional model of elements affecting our perception of a situation: thoughts, mood, action, and physiological sensations.
In the June 2017 issue of Clinical Social Work Journal , Brian Rasmussen, reviews the dominance and weakness of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT).
The review points out a number of pros and cons of CBT, and an especially compelling argument is made for clinicians to reflect on how they might learn, practice, and aim for, a contextually conscientious application of clinical social work interventions:
Western cultural norms of hyper-individualism lay the ground-work for theories and treatments that locate mental health problems in the conscious, rational mind of the person, often decontextualize from his or her social surround.
*” Hot cross buns ” in CBT refers to the cross-sectional model of elements affecting our perception of a situation: thoughts, mood, action, and physiological sensations.